31 October 2012 in ExchangeWire EMEA 7 Comments

Infectious Media RTB Insight Report Summer 2012

The adoption of real-time advertising in the UK and Europe is becoming mainstream. Effective real-time bidding (RTB) campaigns have been running at scale for a number of years, however this buying method is now the first choice for online performance campaigns, and major advertisers are starting to issue RFPs specifically for programmatic media buying and analytics services, something that was unheard of 12 months ago.

The following report was researched and written by Infectious Media using aggregated and anonymised campaign data from Impression Desk. The findings, whilst specific to Infectious Media, represent work carried out for clients spanning all industry sectors with differing objectives, budgets and target audiences, which may be indicative of industry wide trends.

Northern European CPM Hot-Spots

The German-speaking “DACH” countries and the Nordics have the top-valued inventory in Europe, commanding the highest CPM impressions. Austria has come out on top, with Denmark and Finland closely following. In the second tier are Switzerland, Germany, Sweden and Norway.

Contrasting these strong prices are the countries of the south and west of Europe. Spanish and Italian CPMs have both slipped against the rest of Europe, with conflicting growth in Portugal seeing it overtake its Latin neighbours for the first time. Overall, Eastern Europe has continued its relative weakness in CPMs against the rest of Europe. Two notable changes in the region are Turkey, dropping back to an equivalent level of CPM to the rest of Eastern Europe; and Poland, increasing at a rate that brings it up to a level approaching Germany.

Across Europe, the gap between the highest and the lowest CPM countries is becoming more pronounced. Market forces are driving these changes, but unlike a commodity market, not all impressions are made equal. Data, context and position can all play a part in increasing prices, and as more premium inventory is sold on the exchanges the average price will tend to inflate.

UK Advertising Response Rate Drops in August

European CTRs, CPCs and CPMs are seen below in comparison to the UK market. Recent EU CTRs have been turbulent, with a general trend towards a slight lowering of response rates over the summer period. In both the EU and UK, CPMs rose towards the end of spring but then decreased over summer, this may suggest seasonality in buying patterns across these European markets.

CPCs change in accordance with the shifts in CTR and CPM. In the EU, dropping CTRs, combined with an increase in CPMs, saw a spike in May, which was quickly mitigated by an increase in CTRs in June and July. In contrast, UK CPMs and CTRs mirrored each other leading to a relatively low and consistent CPC. We might expect to see an increase in CPMs in the next period in the ramp up to Christmas, with an accompanying increase in CTRs for the festive buying season.

A Measure of Viewablity – Is It Worth It?

Looking at the diagram below, all the regions in Europe demonstrate a strong correlation between increase in frequency of seen-impressions and CTRs. This points to each impression having a cumulative effect on a user’s tendency to click on an advertiser message. Different regions show varying levels of effect, but even in the lowest-performing region, users shown 10 adverts increased their click rate by 10 fold.

While all regions demonstrate an improved click rate per impression with the switch to the seen-impression, the greatest difference was in Eastern Europe and Germany, where the CTR at 20 seen-impressions is four times higher than with standard impressions.

Italy Becomes Attractive Branding Opportunity

Brand marketers with cross-border campaign objectives would ideally be buying in countries where publishers are supplying inventory that delivers high-viewing times per impression. Ireland, Italy and France have shown an increase in user time on a page of over 35%, a significant change, whereas Denmark has seen a massive drop of over 70%. These outcomes could be the result of seasonal changes in browsing behaviour, or reflective of changes in the quality of RTB inventory in these countries.

The shorter time spent on pages in Denmark has resulted in a comparable drop in advert viewing time, as expected. However there are discrepancies, France’s increased page-view time has translated into a loss in advert viewing time of 8%. Here the increase in premium inventory may have been weakened by an increase in unfavourable advertising positions, reducing the average advert viewing time. Italy saw the increase in quality inventory best matched by an increase in view time for the adverts, presenting the most positive shift for brand advertisers across Europe.

French & German Focus

The two largest economies in Europe, with the second and third largest RTB marketplaces, (Rubicon Project Marketplace Report, Aug 12) are addressed here by Infectious Media’s country specialists.

France

French prices in the above graph are consistently above those of the UK market, and on a par with Germany. A look over the last four editions of the Infectious Media Insight Report shows the relative stability of French CPMs in comparison to Europe as a whole.

The graph shows a fall in CPMs in the run up to the summer break, then with a sharp increase in August in the ‘back to school’ season. While there is definitely a seasonal effect being seen here, it is not clear whether this is an artefact of the planning cycle or reflects the intrinsic ROI achievable from the inventory.

The map opposite shows CPM consistency across the French regions.

The main outliers are Paris and Cote d’Azur, where the higher bid price is a possible indicator of better performance in these regions. In general, the third quarter of this year has witnessed a period of increasing awareness of real-time display advertising. The momentum in France has been building with the opening of La Place Media, a large consolidated premium inventory source; eBay, Facebook and Orange announcing the opening of ad-exchanges; and the partnership between 24/7 RealMedia and the Microsoft Advertising Exchange. France is rapidly catching up with the leading markets in Europe.

Sylvain Deffay Country Manager France, Infectious Media, comments: “This upgrade in inventory could not come at a better time for French advertisers, who are under pressure to maximise their ROI in a tough economy. We now need the demand side to step up, as retargeting is still the primary use of RTB in France. While this is a great first step, it is limited to a small part of the sales funnel, maybe only 10 to 15% of the whole process. For success across all marketing objectives, from awareness to CRM, the demand side needs to be working the data harder, producing smarter algorithms, and making the messaging more relevant. The winners in this space will be those able to innovate to gain a competitive edge, throughout the funnel.”

Germany

German prices in the graph below are on average highest of the three RTB marketplaces. The CPMs show a distinct increase in the spring and early summer period, followed by a corresponding drop in July and August. With demand in this period peaking in June, it will be interesting to see how the trend changes in the run up to Christmas.

In the graph above, southern Germany and Hamburg have the highest CPMs, this mirrors the high revenue areas of the country and reflects how audiences in Germany are being targeted. This contrasts the minor variation seen in France, and seems to indicate a difference in how campaigns are being run in these two countries.

In the past 12 months, RTB activity in Germany has been increasing rapidly, with a multitude of new players entering the market. However, according to an Adtech survey at dmexco this September, only 20% of buyers and advertisers attending were buying though RTB. It seems from buy-side enthusiasm, and relatively high prices, that demand is outstripping the supply.

It is widely recognised that the German sales houses control online display supply, with premium inventory at scale not available through RTB. This control is seen to be necessary to protect the CPMs obtained through traditional buying. There is also a supply-side perception that “there is no new money” to be had by moving into RTB.

What is not being taken into account is the value-added aspects of RTB. Inventory where a person can be reached and provided a tailored, relevant message is more valuable to advertisers than buying in the traditional manner. In addition, online media investment is growing at a faster rate than any other media, with display the fastest of all. This is being driven, in part, by efficiencies inherent in the RTB market. The influx of data on the online consumer is driving innovation, better targeting and more efficient spend.

Ultimately, advertisers are looking for a return on their investment, and the current model in Germany does not appear to be creating the best value for advertisers. However, we are now seeing a tipping point. Germany`s real-time industry has a healthy mix of local and international companies on all sides: demand, service and supply. This make-up is helping to push the importance of the RTB agenda and demonstrate the benefits to all players.

Stefan Beckmann, Country Manager DACH, Infectious Media, comments: “The most important aspect of this year’s dmexco exhibition for me was witnessing early-adoption advertisers, who have already seen impressive real-time advertising returns, coming together with premium publishers, now readying themselves to take on RTB. The new entrants to this market can now use their experience to drive buy-side innovation in the German real-time economy.”

International Event Effect on Response Rates – the London Olympics 2012

The maps below show the level of CTR by UK region in the Olympic period. Increases in CTR are tracked as the dots change from red to green as per their scale.

The first map shows a relatively high CTR base-rate for the pre-Olympic summer period, which quickly transitions into decreased CTR at the Olympic start point. As the event continues into August, the CTRs are further reduced, to levels that are unusually depressed for the season. Some UK regions are exhibiting rates that are 30% of what they were only a week before. The last map shows post-Olympic CTRs already beginning to recover.

A study of this kind can have complicating factors, like changes in the weather, holiday periods or advertising objective. However, considering the level of British enthusiasm for the Olympics, it is fair to assume this shift is attributable, at least in part, to the event. These results may be traceable to changing browsing behaviour and less engagement with certain sites or activities, or it may highlight a change of focus towards offline media. The takeaway for advertisers is they need to plan for these kinds fluctuations around international events.



Latest jobs on Exchangewire


  • ChokeIt Monkey

    Excellent, thank you Infectious.

    I think the slow adoption rate is due, in part at least, to the stigma associated with how RTB has been introduced. It has been introduced by “remnant optimisers” when nothing could be further from the truth for programmatic trading.

    The reason RTB is not picking up in Germany has little to do with it not being seen “as new money”, it is being seen as a direct threat to the industry. What has to be remembered is Germany has been bunkered into austerity for the past decade. The Germans know how to protect themselves from the surrounding market forces and if something looks like commodisation, smells like commodisation then it must be. This is absolutely on the money for RTB but not the case for programmatic trading in general.

    The concept of RTB was rolled out and rushed to market without any thought to what it was, a protocol for programmatic. If those that brought it into Europe had focussed on education rather than appending RTB to remnant yield optimisation I suggest up-take would be far stronger.

    Programmatic is without question the future (and the present to some of us) but it needs to be seen for what it is ~ advancement. What it is not is a threat.

    We created the Chainsaw to replace the Axe; the chainsaw did not do people out of jobs, it is not a “simple” solution as a chainsaw is far more complicated than an axe. More people are used in the production, selling, merchandising and servicing of them. Similarly so with programmatic trading, it is a far more sophisticated and efficient method of impression transacting lead by the need of the advertiser to hit more often than not the data-derived pre-qualified user.

    As businesses we now need to look at who we are employing and what their skill-sets need to be. I think the days of the pretty suit bimbling about town are short lived. The days of a mathematician with social skills bimbling about town is not to far away at all.

    Again, thanks Infectious, great research.

  • cpokane

    Some interesting points there. It’ll be interesting to see how this new initiative, 4Q, pans out.

    UIM and Interactive are the two biggest sales houses in the German market, and I get this impression from the fluffy press release last week in Germany and from insiders that this is a broad side against RTB taking hold in Germany.

    These guys like programmatic, and the efficient element of it. But for them impression-level buying at this stage equals commoditisation. This is the way the Sales Houses are thinking.

    You could easily say this is a go-it-alone strategy from the Germans – a sort of a la carte automated trading. Possibly..

    But it seesm to be a broader theme of publisher collaboration in Europe against the rise of US long-tail inventory sources like Facebook and Google.

    This is effectively a lock down of premium German inventory – and it will be interesting to see where this goes. Premium .de domains are coveted by premium brands in the market. I think these pubs want Mercedes and BMW campaigns, not retargeting campaigns from Zalando or Criteo.

    This is a fact of the German market. You want to play in Germany, you have to accept the Sales House always wins – and you must play accordingly.

    These two big sales houses are now trying to figure out how they can get more money from these brands – whiie meeting the demands of the market for programmatic buying. It’s Real-Time Advertising, but in a German stylee.

  • Chris Zaharias

    We’ve been launching dozens of retargeting campaigns on Facebook Exchange (FBX) for sites with 1M-50M+ unique monthly visitors, across five continents, and one clear takeaway is that the new premium inventory in Germany – from a direct response advertiser perspective – is without a doubt Facebook. As best I can summarize it, worldwide FBX converts at a 2-10X higher rate than non-FB RTB, and costs a fraction as much. Combine that with the fact that FB is ~20% of internet page views & >50% of down-time / unfocused page views, and the sales houses’ lock on premium is over.

  • Petteri Vainikka (Enreach)

    Your comment summarizes the German market well, and shows that in markets where sellers still have control over their own inventory and audiences, the digital ad market can be substantially more than merely a pool of intermediary run remnant, with publishers receiving less and less of total digital ad spend (more and more being taken by LUMAscape).

    A similar situation can be found in the Nordic markets – that are similarly controlled by large publisher owned sales houses (although not called such per se) – who are first and foremost interested in premium advertising, not retargeting demand. This ‘locking down’ of supply, and maintaining control of what is sold, to whom, – and how – is how all premium publishers would prefer to do business. Unfortunately in markets already dominated by ad networks and impression-by-impression exchange trading, reversing the loss of sell side power is increasingly difficult.

    Germany, like other markets with a strong sell side, will no doubt adopt the transaction cost efficiencies of programmatic, but not the publisher down sides of RTB. In there sell side strongholds, the future of programmatic is in Programmatic Direct Sales.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=697617185 Ciaran O’Kane

    Chris, I think your perception of premium in Germany is a little warped. I take it you are buying on behalf of US clients. Audience is audience for US advertisers. Regardless of performance, German advertisers whether brand or DR want to be run on these premium .de sites, owned and operated by sales houses. Facebook is not pemium, it’s long tail. And these sales houses are not interested in Dr spend. Maybe spend will shift but I doubt it. Nothing gets done in the German advertising market without the inclusion of the sales houses.

  • Tony

    Agreed – FB is far from premium.

  • ChokeIt Monkey

    Note to Self :: use Triggit to buy Facebook s̶h̶i̶t̶t̶y̶ ̶l̶o̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶a̶i̶l̶.